August 2, 2021

Zero Relative Pronoun

TOPICS:

You got the job you wanted. You got the job that you wanted. Why is "that" optional? It's called the zero relative pronoun.

Click player above to listen to the podcast

Predominantly or predominately?
Posted by June on August 2, 2021
LABELS:

A while back I was editing an article and came across a sentence like “The community is predominately white.” It took me till the second read to notice that “predominately” wasn’t “predominantly.” And I was pretty proud of myself when I caught this “error.” But luckily I wasn’t so cocky as to trust my own judgment. I looked them up.

It turns out that “predominately” and “predominantly” are both legitimate. And if there’s a difference between them, it’s very subtle. This is from "Webster's New World College Dictionary":

predominate: 1. to have ascendancy, authority, or dominating influence (over others); hold sway 2. to be dominant in amount, number, etc.; prevail; preponderate. Related forms: predominately: adverb

predominant: 1. having ascendancy, authority, or dominating influence over others; superior 2. most frequent, noticeable, etc.; prevailing; preponderant. Related forms: predominantly: adverb

“Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage” argues that the words are basically synonyms. So how do you know which one to choose?

Well, if you want to follow someone else’s lead, you could do worse than to take the "Associated Press Stylebook’s" advice:

"predominant, predominantly: Use these primary spellings listed in 'Webster's New World' for the adjectival and adverbial forms. Do not use the alternatives it records, 'predominate' and 'predominately.' The verb form, however, is 'predominate.'"

Plus, Merriam-Webster's usage guide calls “predominately” a “less frequently used alternative” to predominantly. So that could be construed as yet another reason to stick with “predominantly.”

Of course, follow their cue only if you want to march in step with the majority. If you march to the beat of your own drummer, “predominately” is valid, too. It's just not predominant.

June Casagrande is a writer and journalist whose weekly grammar/humor column, “A Word, Please,” appears in community newspapers in California, Florida, and Texas. more

The Best Punctuation Book, Period

A Comprehensive Guide for Every Writer, Editor, Student, and Businessperson

The most comprehensive punctuation guide ever, “The Best Punctuation Book, Period” doesn’t just cover the basic rules. It delves into gray areas of punctuation left unclear by the other rule books, showing how the rules differ in four different editing styles. There's also an A to Z reference of commonly mispunctuated terms. more

Grammar Snobs Are Great Big Meanies

A Guide to Language for Fun and Spite

What do suicidal pandas, doped-up rock stars, and a naked Pamela Anderson have in common? They’re all a heck of a lot more interesting than reading about predicate nominatives and hyphens. June Casagrande knows this and has invented a whole new twist on the grammar book. more

Mortal Syntax

Mortal Syntax takes on the 101 most frequently attacked usage choices. Dedicating one short chapter to each, Casagrande brings her subject to life, teaching English usage through lively and amusing personal anecdotes. more

It Was the Best of Sentences, It Was the Worst of Sentences

Your story may be brilliant. Your insights may be groundbreaking. Your characters may be so real you can almost touch them. But they're not worth a thing if you can't bring them to life in well-written sentences. more

  • Concerted Effort

    June That's an interesting question. Merriam-Webster's has several definitions, one of them: "performed in unison: 'concerted artillery fire.'" So I suppose you could say your capacities worked in concert, making a concerted effort, to heal. But it strikes me as a bit of a stretch.

  • Concerted Effort

    Adrian Could concerted possibly be used in a way that could mean, "With all my faculties." Or even, "with all my functional capacities." Dividing a singular person into a manifold instance of various phenomena? "A concerted effort to heal one's self of suffering."

  • 'Born Of' or 'Borne Of'

    Noel Hennessy Fun with "born vs. borne"...An annotated guide. I am merely a linguaphile with no credentials, but here is my contribution! Lets start with the idioms! An idiom is an expression peculiar to itself (see Merriam-Webster idiom definition ) and as such can break the conventional rules of grammar! (See Dictionary.com, idiom definition). "Born of “ and “Born out of " are idioms according to their Merriam-Webster definitions, so lets let them be and not worry about them! The word "born" and  germane to this discussion “bear" each have numerous meanings, but I'll just deal with the relevant ones here! Born and bear can each refer to childbirth...and childbirth can either be child centered based on “born” or mother centered based on “bear”! See dictionary.Cambridge.org , “bear” definition “born or borne”) Conjugation is easy for child centered birth : born, born, and born! (See cooljugator.com). Here are child centered examples: My grandson is being born as we speak! There is a baby born every minute! He was born in 1950! He wished he had been born in another era! Using “bear” to denote a mother carrying and giving birth is outdated (people say “had” now) but it’s still seen in older literature! So here are mother centered examples based on "bear!” Conjugation: bear, bore, and borne! (See cooljugator.com) She assents to bear a child. She bore a child last spring! She had borne six children in her lifetime! More on “born”...while “born" means human birth, it also means the birth of our thoughts, emotions and ideas! (See Collins Dictionary, “born” definition) (See Cambridge Dictionary, "born" definition). Also, born means to yield, bring forth, resulting from (see Merriam-Webster, born definition ) and bring into existence(see google word search, born): Anxiety born of the Covid era! A mind born of the computer age! Her own business was born! A new partnership born of necessity! A new nation was born! A star is born! Born-again! Now back to "bear, bore and borne"! “Bear" has many other meanings, but I’ll just deal with two that I believe are most pertinent to this topic : Proven or confirmed (see Google word search, bear) : The market will bear out your astute stock choices! A year went by and your choices were indeed borne out! You made money! Carried (in addition to carry and give birth to a baby) and tolerate or endure (see Google word search, bear) : The disease was mosquito-borne! He was a veteran of the 22nd Airborne Division! She bore that burden for many years! He had borne the weight of his past mistakes! I can’t bear another pill! The small truck can’t bear the load! Whew!...I kindly submit the above for your approval! Thank you! Addendum: People often ask, ”What about the phrase ‘bear fruit’...meaning to yield good things?” Cambridge labels it an idiom! Cooljugator declension is bear, bore and borne! But M-W says “born” may be substituted as an acceptable variant for “borne” in this context! (Author’s note: Makes sense, since idioms need not comply with the rules of grammar!) See “bear fruit “ definitions in Cambridge and M-W! See Cooljugator, “bear fruit.” - [ ]

  • 'Beckon Call,' 'All Tolled' and Other Misheard Terms

    John Robertson Your article on "all-told" seems a bit off in one aspect. Recently, I was reporting the amount of rain that we had received to another family member and I reported "All-tolled, we had over 5 inches." The amount was a sum of several days of continued precipitation. While I agree with your point that in general, all-told should be the correct choice, when you are dealing with numeric values, wouldn't all-tolled be more correct? http://Grammar%20Underground

  • 'Whom' vs. 'Who' at the Beginning of a Sentence

    June A.S.: Everything you said is right, but I'm not sure which comment you're directing it at. Are you getting confused by passive voice as it comes into play in these sentences? "I called him" uses the object pronoun "him" because, as you said, is an object. When you invert that sentence to say "He was called," it's not the same sentence structure. In passive voice, the object of the action (so to speak) is made the grammatical subject of the sentence. So "He was called" does, as you said, required the subject pronoun "he." I don't believe anyone said anything to the contrary.