June 30, 2025

Firstly and Secondly

TOPICS: ,

People who hate "firstly" and "secondly" have a hard time explaining why they should be replaced with "first" and "second." That's because there's no grammatical reason for shunning these two adverbs.

Click player above to listen to the podcast

'That' and 'which'
Posted by June on June 30, 2025
LABELS: ,

Here’s a little reminder about “that” and “which”: Editing styles have some strict rules on their usage, but they’re not universal grammar rules, just a style thing.

Here’s the rule, according to the Associated Press Stylebook and the Chicago Manual of Style: “which” can’t be used for restrictive clauses. Only “that” can introduce restrictive clauses.

Restrictive clauses narrow down the things they refer to. Compare:

The hats that have feathers sell the best

with

The hats, which have feathers, sell the best.

In the first example, the clause beginning with “that” actually narrows down which hats we’re talking about. Only the ones that have feathers are being discussed. In the second example, all the hats are being referred to. The “which” clause lets us know that they all have feathers.

So a restrictive clause restricts — narrows down or specifies — its subject. A nonrestrictive clause does not: It can be lifted right out of the sentence without losing specificity of your subject.

And AP and Chicago agree that you can’t use “which” for a restrictive clause. 

“The hats which have feathers sell the best.” That, according to the style guides, is wrong because the clause is supposed to be restrictive. How do we know that the writer meant this clause to be restrictive? The lack of commas. Commas set off nonrestrictive information. To the lack of commas around the clause makes it restrictive.

There’s some logic at the heart of the style rule: Most American English speakers usually use “which” only for nonrestrictive clauses, leaving the other job to “that.” You can also see that keeping these two separate can clear up the potential ambiguity of sentences like “The hats which have feathers will sell best.” (That is, if you doubt the writer’s punctuation skills, you couldn’t be sure whether she meant only the hats that have feathers sell best or whether she meant all the hats sell better than other merchandise and oh, by the way, they all have feathers.)

But unless you’re editing in one of those two styles, you don’t have to worry about this. In my experience, most people manage “that” and “which” clauses well, leaving no question as to what they meant.

June Casagrande is a writer and journalist whose weekly grammar/humor column, “A Word, Please,” appears in community newspapers in California, Florida, and Texas. more

The Best Punctuation Book, Period

A Comprehensive Guide for Every Writer, Editor, Student, and Businessperson

The most comprehensive punctuation guide ever, “The Best Punctuation Book, Period” doesn’t just cover the basic rules. It delves into gray areas of punctuation left unclear by the other rule books, showing how the rules differ in four different editing styles. There's also an A to Z reference of commonly mispunctuated terms. more

Grammar Snobs Are Great Big Meanies

A Guide to Language for Fun and Spite

What do suicidal pandas, doped-up rock stars, and a naked Pamela Anderson have in common? They’re all a heck of a lot more interesting than reading about predicate nominatives and hyphens. June Casagrande knows this and has invented a whole new twist on the grammar book. more

Mortal Syntax

Mortal Syntax takes on the 101 most frequently attacked usage choices. Dedicating one short chapter to each, Casagrande brings her subject to life, teaching English usage through lively and amusing personal anecdotes. more

It Was the Best of Sentences, It Was the Worst of Sentences

Your story may be brilliant. Your insights may be groundbreaking. Your characters may be so real you can almost touch them. But they're not worth a thing if you can't bring them to life in well-written sentences. more

  • ChatGPT can't do me

    mike re: first-person plural. I've made countless edits changing "we" and "our" in technical pieces — there's a strong pull there to use "nurse-person plural" ("how are we feeling today?") in tutorials, recipes, and similar. Clearly AI got it from somewhere, and I think a lot of people are okay with this faux-familiar, we're-in-it-together style. https://www.mikepope.com/blog

  • Not grieving the demise of the semicolon

    23 June 2025 – Optimal Editorial Services […] but unlike Grammar Underground’s June Casagrande, I am a cheerleader for the tipped wink (;) (https://www.grammarunderground.com/not-grieving-the-demise-of-the-semicolon.html). In my opinion, it changes the key of a discussion from major to minor and gives a subtle hint to […] https://www.optimaleditorialservices.co.uk/2025/06/23/23-june-2025/

  • Is 'Alright' All Right?

    Amy Lechter I believe I should have put my comments above into this space. Oh well, hope you might take a moment to respond. I have just watched some of your podcasts and appreciate your direct and honest voice :>) http://amysiegeltutoring

  • Is 'Alright' All Right?

    amy lechter-siegel I am a former college and high school classroom English teacher and now high school and college critical reading and writing tutor and I know and have used so many grammar programs (Easy Grammar with its emphasis on first expunging prep phrases to more easily discern the parts of the sentence is one of my favorites; I like Diane King for a clear basic program as I work with LD students; I like Kahn Academy for its having a teacher with a white board; I like many others as well). None do I LOVE because they are a bit clumsy to use and, though being systematic, structured and exhaustive (as are many of the programs named)is ideal, my students do not/cannot buy into a hundred lessons. Do you have ideas (including your own work of course)for what might constitute an 8-10 lesson program on the most important elements of grammar and (especially) syntax with an audio visual component that would be both systematic and somewhat FUN. Thank you so much. I have ordered your books but, again, I want something short and sweet to use as a "Summer Writing Workshop." http://amysiegeltutoring.com

  • Should you capitalize 'city' in 'city of Boston'?

    M Actually, Chicago capitalizes City if you're talking about the government entity but not if it's talking about the area, so the City of Boston's ordinance vs. the city of Boston's population.